★ ★ ★ ★ Stanford Law Blawg Rates NITA’s Demonstratives eBook
CodeX, Stanford Law’s technology-oriented blawg, recently gave high marks to Demonstratives: Making Effective Graphics for Trial, a new eBook written by Los Angeles-based trial technologist and NITA author John Cleaves.
We’re thrilled to see John, a trial technology attorney and the manager of the Trial Technology Consulting team at Latham & Watkins LLP, receive recognition from one of the top law school tech programs in the country. He’s written an eBook that shows you not only how to create interesting demonstrative exhibits your jurors won’t soon forget, but also—crucially—how those exhibits fit into the narrative you’ll tell them about your client’s case.
Believe it or not, all of the graphics and animations you see in this video were created by John in PowerPoint.
Demonstratives will show you, step by step, how you, too, can create similar exhibits that will elevate the way you advocate for your clients in the courtroom.
Many thanks to Monica Bay at CodeX for both her review and permission to share her review.
From the American Mock Trial Association comes the second edition of State v. Dawson, a case file which delves into the outcome of a car crash. As the case goes, on September 24th, Vanessa Sullivan, daughter of Nita’s most prominent prosecutor, celebrated her 21st birthday with two friends, Taylor Hopson and Danny Dawson at a bar. After several hours the three left in a car driven by Dawson. On the way home, Dawson lost control and crashed the car, killing Sullivan.
A special prosecutor was appointed because of the conflict of interest in having the victim’s parent’s office prosecute the case. A grand jury has returned a multi-count indictment charging the defendant, Danny Dawson, with murder and driving under the influence.
There are four witnesses for the prosecution and four for the defense. The exhibits include an audio recording of the voicemail left by Vanessa Sullivan immediately before the crash.
Retail Price: $38
Last summer, USPTO patent judge and NITA author Ryan H. Flax wrote our very first case file on patent law, SwimTime Corp. v. Water-Fun, Inc., a complex case involving the alleged design infringement of pool floats.
Yes. Pool floats.
So, imagine our surprise here in the Publications Department when, a year later, we came across a story in Jezebel (hey, no judging!) about a complex case involving the alleged design infringement of . . . pool floats.
Judge Flax’s response to the weird Venn diagram of “life imitates art imitates life” overlapping with “it’s déjà vu all over again”?
And thanks to Judge Flax, yes, we did.
Last night in Dallas, amid a peaceful demonstration against police shootings (largely by white officers), there was a sniper. He was African-American. He shot the police. He shot towards and at the largely black group marching for justice, and at an important voice against urban violence – Black Lives Matter. His shots hit their mark.
They cannot hit our freedom to assemble, or our non-violent demonstrations and marches. They must not. Nor can they hit the peaceful movement calling for just and appropriate police action. What is more, this unique Dallas event showed how good relationships among police officers and African Americans can look in urban centers. Police-Black Citizens strife was not at play in the demonstration itself. Yes, it was the topic. No, there was little of no such rivalry or aggression in Dallas demonstration. Quite the opposite, the officers dressed without riot gear, used and benefited from good credibility and relationships they have worked hard to develop, and worked as humans and professionals to maximize the peaceful (and effective) event.
So, the police officers are to pay? Of course not.
This cross-cutting of race, violence, protest, and freedom of speech exemplify a cauldron of actions based on automatic bias in our country. (You can think immediately of other examples in the political realm.) This event is unique. With that come an opportunity and a responsibility.
The opportunity is for us to use this moment to discuss bias and assumptions nationally. Indeed, shortly after the event and in the time since I wrote this blog, social media and new outlets have raised some of those issues. But we can hold the moment for longer than a news flash. We must combat the thinking that some groups in our diverse and heterogeneous society — a cultural trait which is our national treasure – are more privileged than others to hold sway, exert power, and predominate simply as a matter of privilege. No one group has a “propensity” to violence or a uniform viewpoint of what is right.
The responsibility accrues from our special status as members of the bar. The Dallas shootings situation deserves our reflection as lawyers. But we must act too, in our own cultures and communities. We swore to uphold our Constitution and to preserve and pursue justice. What inspiration for action do we gain from the Dallas events?
In the same vein, as a clergyman, Reverend Jeff Hood shared his insights that morning after. He was there in Dallas. In fact, he was one of the organizers of the day’s successful demonstration. At the front of the march, he was one of the first to hear the sniper’s shooting. He told NPR:
“Ultimately, I spent those three hours talking to people, asking the question, ‘Why? Why? Why is this happening?’ The only answer I know now, and the only answer I knew then, was turn to love, we’ve got to turn to love, we’ve got to stop shooting.” (Rev. Jeff Hood, Dallas, July 8, 2016, reported in CNN report 7-8-2016
As lawyers, and as citizens with that special knowledge and duty, what is it that lawyers are trained for, and good at, that our national society needs? You know how to answer. Share your answer with me and with each other
If clergy citizens can call for love and find ways to encourage it, lawyer citizens can call for what? How about personally acting locally and constantly to call for –
These are things we lawyers are good at. Are we using those talents as opportunities?
Karen M. Lockwood, Esq.
President and Executive Director
National Institute for Trial Advocacy
Author John Cleaves latest ebook, Demonstratives: Making Effective Graphics for Trial, teaches the reader step by step how to develop a consistent theme or “brand” throughout your demonstratives so they have their own look and feel that jurors can readily identify as your side of the case. Likewise, he creates a variety of timelines that tell and sell your client’s story in the order it happened, make your important quotes look like they were created by a professional graphic artist, transform data charts, and so much more!
If you have often wondered how you can use tools such as PowerPoint to your advantage by learning how to visually bring your case to life, then this ebook is right for you. This ebook’s functionality is optimized on an iPad because it enables you to pinch-zoom the graphics to view the details, but it may also be downloaded to your desktop and viewed with Adobe Digital Editions.
Available in eBook here.
NITA’s team of practicing lawyers, professors and judges from around the nation dedicates its efforts to the training and development of skilled and ethical legal advocates to improve the adversarial justice system.
NITA’s Goals are to: