Marcia Levy has continued to inspire others through her generous efforts to give back to her community through public service acts. Now, as the Executive Director for Pro Bono Partnership, a tri-state group that recruits volunteer attorneys to help nonprofit organizations, Levy has found that by helping even one nonprofit to grow, she can help hundreds of people whom the organization serves.
According to the New York Law Journal, at the start of her career, Levy had a growing interest in prisoner rights and aided her passion by helping people in New York City prisons whose living situations were unsafe and fighting for their conditions to change. Levy has contributed her efforts here at NITA by participating in many of our programs as a Director, Faculty member, and Speaker. By being a part of NITA’s programs, she is able to reach out and help more people.
Author Steven Lubet’s latest edition Modern Trial Advocacy: Analysis and Practice, 5th Edition, helps beginners learn better advocacy skills with a thorough approach beginning with a case theory all the way through the steps of a trial. Modern Trial Advocacy: Analysis and Practice has been NITA’s best-selling text since 1993 and sets the standards high for other publications teaching advocacy skills. Many law schools have relied on this text for teaching purposes and the 5th Edition is sure to impress. Lubet explains how to present each case as a story and what you need to do in order to persuade the jury.
The 5th Edition provides a new chapter on electronic visuals and technology in the courtroom as well as new video-enhanced content where NITA faculty demonstrate techniques portrayed in the text to help readers visualize in a whole new way.
Retail Price: $85
We are proud to announce Hugh Gottschalk is named 2016 Denver “Lawyer of the Year” for Bet-the-Company Litigation by The Best Lawyers in America 2016 edition. Gottschalk is the President of Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell which represents many well-known professionals in legal disputes. Only one lawyer in each practice community is awarded and therefore, Gottschalk has truly set an example for his peers with this exceptional achievement. He has handled many high-stake cases throughout his career such as his pro-bono role in the major copyright lawsuit, Golan v. Holder.
Likewise, Gottschalk has participated as a Faculty member on many of our programs here at NITA in order to share his knowledge and skills with others. Some of his specialties include Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property Litigation, and Product Liability Defense Litigation. We at NITA congratulate Gottschalk for this honorable recognition and his commitment to advocating for cases he feels passionately about.
NITA congratulates Dickstein Shapiro Partner James R. Murray who was recently inducted as a Fellow into the American College of Trial Lawyers. Fellowship into the group is extended by invitation only and presented to those who have achieved high standards in advocacy.
By achieving such a great honor, we at NITA recognize Murray’s skills through the dedication he showed as a Faculty member in a number of our Seattle-based programs. From June of 2000 through September of 2014, Murray displayed his knowledge and helped others as he advanced his advocacy skills as a Faculty member here at NITA.
Written by guest blogger Judge McGahey
In the August, 2015 edition of the ABA Journal, there’s an excellent article titled “100 Years of Law at the Movies.” I’ve reviewed many of the movies listed, but realized I’d neglected a number of great ones. I’m going to try and remedy that, starting with a 1959 movie about murder, insanity and the death penalty that will have real resonance for me and my fellow Coloradans who’ve recently watched with fascination the death penalty trials of James Holmes, the Aurora theater shooter.
Compulsion (20th Century Fox, 1959) tells the story of two rich, amoral Chicago law students, Judd Steiner (Dean Stockwell) and Artie Straus (Bradford Dillman). Judd and Artie consider themselves superior beings, supermen who are not controlled by the laws and mores that other people have to follow. They decide to kill someone, just to see what it feels like. They plan their murder and commit it, abducting a random schoolboy and slaying him in gruesome fashion. Not surprisingly, their “perfect crime” isn’t and they are caught and put on trial. Their wealthy fathers hire the well-known criminal defense attorney, Johnathan Wilk (Orson Welles) to defend them. Wilk decides on a drastic strategy: he admits his clients committed the murder, dispenses with a jury and fights against the execution of his clients before a judge sitting alone, claiming that his clients are insane, the product of warped values exacerbated by their wealth and social position. Wilk and prosecutor Harold Horn (E.G. Marshall) then go to war for Judd and Artie’s lives.
This movie is one that is actually “based on true events.” In 1924, two rich young men from Chicago, Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb kidnapped and killed a fourteen year-old boy named Bobby Franks. They were put on trial and were defended by the great lawyer, Clarence Darrow. Darrow was perceived as a champion of the downtrodden and overlooked of society, and his defense of two children of the wealthy raised eyebrows. The Leopold and Loeb case was a national sensation, with extensive – and lurid – media coverage. The case continues to fascinate people. If you don’t believe me, type “Leopold and Loeb” into your search bar.
This movie is one well worth watching. The trial scenes are riveting and the acting is first class; Welles, Stockwell and Dillman collectively received the Best Actor Award at the 1959 Cannes Film Festival. Compulsion is number 19 on the ABA’s 25 Greatest Legal Movies list that was published in 1959.
But have no illusions. Compulsion is a movie with explicit agendas: it is clearly and unashamedly against the death penalty and also argues forcefully that legal definitions of “insanity” are inadequate. But it also brilliantly creates the dilemma faced by the supporters and the opponents of both concepts. The crime committed here is random, heinous, frightening, incomprehensible. And the murderers are utterly unsympathetic. They are obnoxious rich kids who believe themselves to be the intellectual superiors of everyone else on earth, but on the surface they look completely normal, a couple of spoiled jerks. Compulsion forces the viewer to confront how he or she feels about these issues and to think about how our society deals with them. For those of us in Colorado who just lived through a close-up view of a trial with incomprehensible murders, where sanity or insanity was the key to the Defendant’s case, these questions are still fresh.
And still unanswered.